🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours prior to the NYC race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange issued a significant electoral prediction – not just who would win overall, and block by block. The analyst, an expert in elections born and raised in the city, has spent over a decade in left-leaning activism and emerged as a kind of well-known figure this year for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and polling.

He released his extremely precise prediction map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate would win while missing the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his Substack, his platform. He has a flair for clever terms. He highlighted, for instance, the split between the “commie corridor”, running from Park Slope to another area to a third locale, where he forecasted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, certain media outlets and financial newspapers outrank the mainstream paper” in readership and most voters favored the independent, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Trends and Unexpected Results

How was your election night?

It was necessary since they were adding approximately 200K votes into the tally every few minutes! I was actually a little nervous initially: The candidate was ahead the early vote by 12 points, but there were two big batches of ballots that came in later and the advantage went from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, there was a world where yesterday went kind of poorly for Mamdani, in which Cuomo would have basically doubling his votes from the earlier contest. But Mamdani added half a million votes to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he won. He campaigned and massively expanded his base from the first round.

Expanding Support

How did Mamdani gain additional support from?

He assembled the alliance that the left long aimed for: it’s multiracial, it’s young, it’s renters and individuals squeezed by affordability. He improved considerably with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the earlier election. Additionally he boosted his core of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He built the alliance that the left long aimed for: diverse, young, renters and residents struggling with costs

There were also a number of supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It’s definitely a real thing, confined to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Muslims. Voters in ethnic enclaves that went for Trump previously backed Zohran now. But I wouldn’t say he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Impact

A major development of the election was the sky-high participation. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Participation was significantly higher than anticipated. I thought it could go over two million, but it reached 2.3 million – which is a lot of darn voters. Existed a substantial anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but his supporters was equally driven, and that was enough to win.

You predicted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he likely for that?

Currently it appears he’s favored to get over half. He’s at 50.4% but remain around 200K ballots left to report as of Wednesday morning. So it’s not certain, but I believe probable, and I wish he does because then no one can say Sliwa was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His support plummeted.

He lost any district in any area. Including Tottenville in Staten Island, similar to an 88% Trump area. That truly surprised me. The independent kept very white areas, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained all of these conservatives on Staten Island with a strong turnout. I think there was a lot of tactical voting by GOP voters. This happened before Trump tweeted his support for Cuomo, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide unless the winning alliance failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your much mentioned “commie corridor” – did backing for the candidate dominant in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view there was some weakening of the commie corridor in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. There, for example, the Greek landlords and homeowners supported the independent. Thus there was some opposition. But no, mostly the commie corridor is another huge reason why Zohran won – he scored between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

Prior to the election there was coverage on if Mamdani was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he succeeded?

There are areas with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts such as the Upper East Side, his position on Israel definitely mattered in those places. Similarly in the moderate communities like Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. Plus, you have newcomers from Eastern Europe in the borough, they were strongly Cuomo. Therefore I don’t know if existed crazy narrative-busters on this one, but Mamdani retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what the city means politically? Will progressive base serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s not accidental that key political leaders from progressives hail from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that there will be more of that – people will emerge from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

However I think that each urban center in America could develop similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the centers of progressive influence in America – since they’re young, tenancy is common and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the disparities exist.