🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial move to ban social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves around the globe. Officials, safety advocates, and guardians are monitoring closely to see if this approach will become a template for the rest of the world.

European Movement

In Europe, a increasing chorus of states are considering similar measures.

• Denmark has announced a ban on social media for under-15s, with the leader arguing that mobile devices and apps are "taking away our children's innocence". Legislation is expected to be formalized soon.
• Norway is set to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to shield young people from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a digital wallet to confirm the age and identity of social media account holders. Officials have suggested that an Australia-style ban could be "an measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the president has called on parliament to enact a bill raising the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has recommended a similar move, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The government in The Netherlands has advised families to restrict their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has passed a non-binding resolution supporting a ban for minors without parental consent is granted. Although it cautions of the "addictive" quality of these services, the move does not establish enforceable legislation.

"An effective age barrier is a solid foundation," said a leading European lawmaker supporting the initiative.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Stance

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has remained open to a potential ban, arguing that "no option is being dismissed" but maintaining any policy must be "supported by robust data".

Earlier, support grew behind a legislative effort to introduce controls on social media use by minors, but it was eventually watered down. Nonetheless, the government committed to conduct more studies the issue.

Charities have expressed concerns. A prominent charity established by the loved ones of a young person who died after being exposed to dangerous online content argues that a simple age ban might not protect children and could result in a "cliff edge" of risk when users turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the inability of the social media companies to create products and services that are secure and suitable for minors," said a influential peer.

The US: A Decentralized Approach

In the United States, legislation is mostly happening at the local government level due to country-wide inaction.

• Utah requires parental consent for minors to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has signed a measure banning under-14s from accessing social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• Virginia has approved a law limiting minors to one hour of social media time per day, with any further use requiring adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise enacted laws mandating adult authorization for teenagers to create social media profiles.

Even with cross-party agreement and calls from some individuals to follow this path, a federal ban is right now seen as improbable.

International Outlook

Beyond Europe and the US, other states are likewise taking action.

• Malaysia plans to restrict social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the access age for one major platform to 16.

However, global agencies take a more measured position. The UN children's agency has warned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "could prove counterproductive". The body points out that social networks can be a "vital connection" for marginalized young people and that government action should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to improve child safeguards.

While this international debate evolves, the actions of this nation and its followers demonstrate that states internationally are no longer content to wait for tech companies to act voluntarily.